Beginners Guide For Kingdom Age

[Saint Chad]

There are a couple ways to raise your attack/defense:

Try buying better units in bulk

Loot or purchase better equipment for your army (I would advice to loot and not waste money on expensive unit equip.)

For defense you can build defense buildings, this adds to your characters defense, and an additional protection to all the buildings in its radius

Just one more question. *

If I have two defense towers (together), does that double the total coverage or do I consider it as just one tower? *


Thanks for everything. *

[Ghost818]

In my opinion it would be just one tower covering the buildings. But if you want to know for sure, you can contact Support and post their answer here so we all know for sure

[ShawnBB]

Hi, ghost. Imma throw a question here about the defense units replace management.

Early game, fully loaded with illusionist is strong enough to fend off all non big gold players.
And now i need to improve my defense density to defend against gold players.

So here are all the options.
1- go for cheapest 14 def rifleman, then 17 def paladin.
2- lvl 8 magic academy, 17 def Mage guy.
3- lvl 6 siege factory, 17 def zeppelin.
4- lvl 4 wizard castle, 20 def earth elemental,lvl 7 will unlock the 32 def unit priest.

Might need some insight.

[Ghost818]

It all depends on what your economy can handle, I went with #1.

[Mcdoc]

Has there been any discovery if Machines have a lower casualty rate over Magic or Beast units? I thought I saw that somewhere and have been heavy on machine units - but they seem to die off pretty often (which Is probably due to the sheer % of my units being machines).

Thanks!

[Ghost818]

Check out the Data Sheet, it has the casualty rates of all the units. Make sure to just make a copy of your own if you want to sort or edit things, File>>Make a Copy

[Mcdoc]

Check out the Data Sheet, it has the casualty rates of all the units. Make sure to just make a copy of your own if you want to sort or edit things, File>>Make a Copy

That was absolutely no help at all. It was a simple question really. I read the your original guide, glanced over it again before I posted my simple question.

Being referred to a speeadsheet for a simple yes or no question really is annoying.

Maybe someone who actually understands what I am asking will chime in.

Thanks anyway.


EDIT: Sorry to be so frank - but I thought my question was simple enough to get a simple answer. Being referred to a Datasheet (with no link) just simply annoyed me. On the MW forum, if I am going to take the time to answer someone's question - I take the time to actually answer it.

[FisK]

Hi Mcdoc

You wonted a Yes or No answer to question: Have Machines lower casualty rate then Magic and Beast units.
The answer is YES and NO


Yes Machines has lower casualty rate then Magic units.
No Machines do not have lower casualty rate then Beast units


To find the answer for you I have calculated the average casualty rate for each unit type:

Unit type Ave. Casualty rate
Infantry 0.0098852
Beast 0.01
Machine 0.0118676
Magic 0.0442058


It is very close race between Infantry, Beat and Machine units.
I fully understand why Ghost818 ask you to look at the datasheet. The average casualty rate for a unit type is really not that useful information because people usually don’t buy one of each unit.
The casualty rate of the units you are actually thinking of buying is more relevant and that you can lookup in the datasheet


The datasheet:
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/...lE&pli=1#gid=9

[Ghost818]

That was absolutely no help at all. It was a simple question really. I read the your original guide, glanced over it again before I posted my simple question.

Being referred to a speeadsheet for a simple yes or no question really is annoying.

Maybe someone who actually understands what I am asking will chime in.

Thanks anyway.


EDIT: Sorry to be so frank - but I thought my question was simple enough to get a simple answer. Being referred to a Datasheet (with no link) just simply annoyed me. On the MW forum, if I am going to take the time to answer someone's question - I take the time to actually answer it.

I apologize if my answer didnt meet your needs. Cant make everyone happy. My first comment was a more broad answer that may have answered other questions along with the one you have now. The link is already provided on the first page of the Guide. Fisk said everything else needed to be said.

[Mcdoc]

Thanks Fisk. And Ghost - I understand - I was just popping in for a quick answer.

I thought I had read a comment somewhere or strategy saying that machines were less likely to die in attacks. What I really wanted to know was if Beasts or Machines were the toughest.

I apologize for being a bit testy - the answer wasn't as simple as I expected.